Rich nations should help poor ones and rich persons should help poor ones however, the way the world is, right now, money = power so, powerful countries and persons lose control when the average person no longer needs any help. Essay topics: rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve povertytherefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid. Aid amounts are dwarfed by rich country protectionism that denies market access for poor country products, while rich nations use aid as a lever to open poor country markets to their products large projects or massive grand strategies often fail to help the vulnerable as money can often be embezzled away. Finally, rich nations should help to improve the economy of poor countries this can be done by promoting free trade this wi l l reduce barriers to international trade such as tariff s , import quotas and export fee s and will help to lift the developing countries out of poverty. The story holds that the rich nations of the oecd give generously of their wealth to the poorer nations of the global south, to help them eradicate poverty and push them up the development ladder.
In designing aid, there's a natural tendency to address immediate needs, economic historian gregory clark tells paul solman in the fifth and final part of their conversation about his 2007 book. Poor countries depend on richer nations for crucial financial aid to improve infrastructure and promote social welfare programs world poverty is a major problem and rich countries should definitely lend money at no interest viewpoint borrowing financial aid from rich countries has become a big problem because of high interest rates. Rich nations should step up to support countries that are still accepting refugees we have a window to avoid a refugee catastrophe in east africa if we act now.
The debt of developing countries refers to the external debt incurred by governments of developing countries, generally in quantities beyond the governments' ability to repay. On the other hand, some people feel that poor countries should learn to help themselves and it is not the responsibility of rich nations to help them if poor countries continually accept food and money they might become lazy and expect hand-outs. Foreign aid - transfers from rich countries to poor countries - has much to its credit, particularly in terms of health care, with many people alive today who would otherwise be dead but foreign aid also undermines the development of local state capacity. There are many reasons for helping poor countries first of all, there are humanitarian reasons like individuals who give to charity, many countries feel it is their religious, social, or moral duty to help people in other countries who are suffering from famine, drought, war, or disease however.
Poor nations around the world have struggled with natural disasters and disease for years, of course, and developed countries have always felt an obligation to help hence, global programs like the un millennium development goals, which aim to reduce poverty, disease and mortality, and empower developing countries. Ii why aid i want in the rest of this paper to talk about aid from rich countries to poor ones i accept ivan sammut's (2008:221-2) point that trade flows vastly exceed the size of any possible aid but i also draw attention to his. The index penalizes countries for barriers to sharing technology and imports from developing countries, selling arms to poor and undemocratic nations, and for maintaining policies that harm global. Best answer: although it would be nice to have the rich nations help the poorer nations, it doesn't always work that way rich people hardly ever help poor people on a more personal level either rich people hardly ever help poor people on a more personal level either. Ielts2: should rich countries help poor countries essay in health, poor and trade are poor for the development of poorer nations however, the governments of nations nations should nations more responsibility for helping the how nations in such areas.
These countries—which in africa would include ghana, mozambique, tanzania, and uganda, and which might number at least a dozen worldwide—should be fast-tracked for much more aid, it says. In rich, as compared to poor, countries has high economic growth as a top priority, and a staggering one in three less in europe compared to poor countries figure 1: high economic growth as number one priority of wvs three choices and per capita income (in. The rich nations have to move 'beyond aid' and systematically reform international trade rules, climate change, migration, access to finance and technology, while genuinely promoting social justice as a global social norm. The problem is not just with rich nations not giving enough aid to help starving nations, there are also problems with the starving areas themselves look at any region which is threatened with mass starvation and you will find a region beset by civil wars and tribal/ethnic conflicts. Best answer: charities create dependence welfare creates apathy what the wealthier nations need to do is lend tiny amounts of money to enterpreneurs in poor countries (this is called microeconomix.
First, as the graph shows, the rich countries with the smallest income differences within them tend to spend a higher proportion of their gross national income on aid to developing countries second, more equal countries also perform better on the global peace index which reflects militarism and violence. Developed countries are helping poor countries by giving financial assistance to improve their economy, education and health system some poor countries use this financial aid in building classroom, improve agriculture and support local investors. These contrasts raise the question of whether people living in rich nations have a moral obligation to aid those in poor nations currently, less than 1/2 of 1% of the total world gross national product is devoted to aiding poverty-stricken nations.
Rich countries have to be careful when helping poor nations it involves a lot of politics so the rich have the right to choose the recipient and ensure the aid does not get into the wrong hands. The people in poor countries have the same aspirations as those in rich countries — to have the same chances and opportunities, good health care, clean running water in their homes and high. To some people, rich nations should lend aid to poor ones because of its economic, diplomatic, politic and military advantages meanwhile, opponents claim that on account of their possibilities of financial distress in the future, they should not do so i am of the former notion for the following reasons the first reason for rich countries do lend aid to impoverished ones is economic advantage.